diet coke for breakfast


Monday, August 04, 2003

Posted by Tanstaafl
CNN.com - Davis files suit to change, postpone recall election - Aug. 4, 2003: "In the lawsuit filed with California's Supreme Court, the Democratic incumbent called for the vote to be delayed until March and for his name to be listed among the candidates seeking to replace him. "

Someone has to explain this to me. As I blogged last week, the State Constitution says CLEARLY that Davis may not be one of the replacement candidates on the ballot. I understand that often lawyers and judges find things in the law that no one inteded to be there, but can they honestly claim that it should just be tossed aside because Davis doesn't like it? Is this just a huge waste of his time and money? Is he just trying to tie it up in court until he can rally more support or in the hopes that his approval ratings will improve?


0 Comments:

Post a Comment


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?