diet coke for breakfast |
|
Home | Archives NYTimes | Washington Post | CNN | WSJ | The Economist | MSNBC | Weekly Standard | Opinion Journal InstaPundit | Andrew Sullivan | Spinsanity | Lileks | TCS | NRO | TNR | Reason | Slate | Drudge Day by Day | OxBlog | Daniel Drezner | Political Wire | Command Post | Wonkette | The Hill | Roll Call |
|
Friday, October 24, 2003
Posted by RFTR
National Review Online (http://www.nationalreview.com): "For some reason or another, a series of enormously important issues — the future of the Middle East, the credibility of the United States as both a strong and a moral power, the war against the Islamic fundamentalists, the future of the U.N. and NATO, our own politics here at home — now hinge on America's efforts at creating a democracy out of chaos in Iraq. That is why so many politicians — in the U.N., the EU, Germany, France, the corrupt Middle East governments, and a host of others — are so strident in their criticism, so terrified that in a postmodern world the United States can still recognize evil, express moral outrage, and then sacrifice money and lives to eliminate something like Saddam Hussein and leave things far better after the fire and smoke clear. People, much less states, are not supposed to do that anymore in a world where good is a relative construct, force is a thing of the past, and the easy life is too precious to be even momentarily interrupted. We may expect that, a year from now, the last desperate card in the hands of the anti-Americanists will be not that Iraq is democratic, but that it is democratic solely through the agency of the United States — a fate worse than remaining indigenously murderous and totalitarian."
Whether you agree or not, you must admit it's a good point. 0 Comments:
|
|
